THEORY OF FALLING BODIES II

As a body begins to fall a centrifugal force is applied to the body and is "felt" in the opposite direction of the fall (figure 43).

This centrifugal force results in mass being "compressed" at the upper portion of the body, i.e., in the opposite direction of the fall (figure 44).

This area of compressed mass results in an area of greater density. To obtain greater density of

The compressed area, due to centrifugal force, results in an area of densified mass. This increased density results from the expulsion/extraction of space (i.e.,

The male area of the body has a higher than normal density of mass and is surrounded by a greater value of gravity than is the female area. Nature will

During these early stages of a body's fall, its velocity is continually increasing, and the greater the velocity of the falling body the greater the rotation rate or spin value of that body. Due to this rotation/spin, the previously discussed centrifugal force is now being distributed around the entire body at the leading edge of the fall, or equator of the body. Centrifugal force causes mass to densify along this equator and to therefore expell space (i.e., gravity). As the value of the rotation/spin increases in value, neutral energy (better known as gravity) is expelled or extracted along the entire equator of the body (i.e., the leading edge of the fall) in ever increasing amounts (figure 47).

We will now turn the body ninety degrees and observe a cut-away view (figure 48).

Upon exiting the body the extracted energy moves or "flows" in a direction that lies parallel to the body. This results in the "bubbles of nothing" called gravity orbiting the falling body, and due to the continued motion of the body, each orbit completed by a given "bubble" is slightly larger than its previous orbit (figure 49).

As the "squeezed out" space of the compressed or densified mass leaves the falling body it instantly obtains a greater spin velocity, which in turn tends to further the rotation/spin value of the falling body itself. The people of the Project Stardust team refer to this extracted or repelled energy as gravity A. During the times of Newton this flow of gravity was assumed to be a force which "pulled" towards the center of the body - an understandable misconception in those early days. Now, however, we know that gravity is a

The rotating or spinning body must have an axis of rotation. The center of the axis of rotation obtains a zero, or near zero value of motion, and therefore, little or no centrifugal force is felt at the axis. With very little centrifugal force there is no compression of mass along this axis. At the same time, the leading edge of the body (90 degrees from the axis) is experiencing great centrifugal force, and mass along this equator is compressed. At the center of this equatorial plane then, lies a point of zero or near zero motion, which again will contain no compressed mass. It is in these areas of low or zero motion where the mass has "room" for expansion, and the atoms within this mass will seek to expand. To accomplish expansion, space (gravity) is required, and where there is an area which lacks sufficient quantities of gravity, there can be said to exist a gravitational void or vacuum. Quite clearly, it is at the point where the axis of rotation and the equatorial plane intersect which will present the greatest gravitational vacuum (figure 50).

This situation creates a difference in potential between the dense gravity at the equator or the falling body and the lack of, or the "need" for gravity along the axis of rotation. We can therefore view the axis area as a positive, or female area, and the leading edge or equator of the body as negative, or male

This difference in potential between the male and female areas causes the outwardly spiraling neutral energy shown in figure 49 to

We will now turn figure 51 ninety degrees and observe the axis of rotation as illustrated in

We now take note of a very interesting phenomenon of falling bodies. The gravitational "flow" just described is moving in the same direction in both hemispheres of the falling body, and also moves in the same direction as it re-enters the body. However, when one observes the falling body at an axis area, the ingoing vortex is perceived to be moving in a given direction (i.e., clockwise or counter-clockwise), while an observe stationed at the other axis would perceive the ingoing vortex to be moving in the

This phenomenon is very difficult to clearly show in an illustration, yet it is absolutely vital to an understanding of atomic particle assimilation/atomic structure, so if this concept is yet unclear, we suggest the reader take a moment and test it out first hand through the following simple means.

Take any spherical object that's handy - a ball, orange, grapefruit, etc. - and designate an axis on each end of the sphere. Now, with one of your axes pointing upwards, draw a curved arrow around that axis to denote the direction of gravitational flow. Lift the sphere straight up and place a curved arrow around that axis also – making very sure that when viewed from the side, the two arrows are pointing in the

We have seen why a falling body begins to rotate/spin, and we've seen that the same factors of greater/lesser potential (due to centrifugal force) produce the mysterious force now spoken of as "attractive" gravity. Now we will move into a discussion of the Siamese twin of gravity, and attempt to explain the creation of a magnetic field. To do this we must first find solid footing to build upon, and so must back up to the time of empirical science and the infinitely valuable and reliable work of Michael Faraday.

Michael Faraday discovered through hands-on experimentation that a spinning disc resulted in a flow of electric (mass) from the circumference of the spinning disc to the axis of the disc (figure 54).

Please note that existing drawings of Faraday's "unipole" generator show opposite brush polarities. Until very recently it was believed that electric flowed from positive to negative. Faraday found that an increase of R.P.M. resulted in an increased electrical flow. He also found that a consistant R.P.M. with an increased circumference of the disc would result in an increase of electrical flow. We can therefore deduce that the sum total factor is the velocity of the circumference.

We will now look at the

As the above disc (which is

We have seen that a falling body produces an area of compressed mass which in turn causes the body to spin/rotate. We've seen that to compress mass the space the atom normally possesses is reduced, and that this extracted energy (gravity/space) then detects the lesser gravitational potential at the axis - at which time it moves toward this void and re-enters the body. It has likewise been shown that this extracted energy, in its travels around the body, "pushes" all things existing within the gravitational field toward the surface of the body. This is gravity A - the "attractive" portion of gravity.

With all of this reasonably clear we may now continue on and examine the inertial force which allows the Faraday generator to function, and in so doing we can readily show why a falling body produces a magnetic field.

That which generates the "power" to produce a flow of electric (i.e., mass) is

Due to centrifugal force,

The axis area of the rotating/spinning disc or body now presents a condition where mass is "missing". The axis area of "missing mass" is now seen as a positively charged area (or female factor). The escaped mass (i.e., electrical field) around the spinning/rotating disc or body becomes the male factor and can be seen as or measured by instruments as a negative charge. At this point then, the disc is in an unbalanced state, with an abundance of mass around the circumference, and a severe absence of mass along the axis. The mass ejected due to inertia forces will continue to move out away from the disc

It is commonly known that electric will follow the path of least resistance. Should a brush be placed on the axis and on the circumference of a spinning disc with a conductor between the brushes, a current (or electric) flow will exist in the conductor. In the case of the Faraday generator, should brushes and conductor

This flow of electricity has been proven through careful testing by the Project Stardust team and by researchers globally. Now, by applying what has been said to a falling body, the "secret" of the repulsive force can be seen, and a primary consideration in this discussion is

If the Faraday generator were placed in a concise east-west direction

This flow of electric

Having clarified that point we may now

To quickly review: a falling body rotates due to centrifugal force, creating an area of compressed mass. When a falling body rotates/spins, centrifugal force is applied at the equator, or leaing edge of the fall. This in turn causes the atoms and particles within the body to be affected by the law of inertia and to be ejected from the falling body (see figure 60).

It is now time to show some of the finer details of what was happening to those test balls by applying what we know of gravity and magnetism. Figure 61 illustrates the rotation and electrical flow of one of our test bodies (see paper titled

By studying figure 61 it can be seen that, as with the Faraday generator, the electric flow through our test body follows the path of least resistance, and so aligns with the pre-existing electric flow of planet earth. Electric is simply

Our test body had only a short distance (2,000 feet) in which to fall. Had it been able to continue its fall it would have continued to increase its velocity until balanced gravitational and electric (mass) cycles were established. A falling body which is allowed to continue its fall will continue to expell mass at increasing rates until reaching a balanced threshold. Not all of the mass thus expelled travels the same route back into the axis area of the body, but rather tends to "spread out" as the body continues to accelerate. As with the Faraday generator, this ejected mass will continue to spread out

As these different flows of mass establish themselves, they quite clearly are moving in the same direction, and so are of like polarities. This means that there will be a repulsion between these different flows of mass, resulting in these flows establishing shells or "lines" of moving mass which are separate from one another.

It must be apparent that a so called magnetic field is not merely the "effects of" a flow of electric, as pseudoscience teaches, but rather is a flow of electric (i.e., mass). There is nothing mystical about it - a magnetic field is simply mass in motion in a given direction. If this can be comprehended, we may now proceed to consider the inertia forces applied to these shells of mass, and in so doing we can at last rescue gravity from the "effects of" pseudoscience.

As the magnetic field around a falling body expands, the outermost shells must obtain a greater velocity than the inner shells in order to keep up with the rotational rate of the body below. This need for greater velocity within the outer shells is due to the simple fact that mass within these shells has a greater distance to traverse than the inner shells, yet must travel this distance in the same amount of time as mass in the inner shells. The principle is clearly seen by observing the velocities involved in a wheel, i.e., a point near the axis moves with the axis, but travels a much shorter distance than a point on the edge of the wheel, which also must keep up with the movement of the axis. The point on the edge of the wheel must move faster than the point near the axis.

Due to the inertial force applied to the mass in the outer shells (lines) of the magnetic field, there is a point where the outer shells can no longer keep up with the surface of the falling body, when this happens, the outer shells begin to

The mass within these shells is en route to the axis area, to balance the "need" for mass there. These shells are rotating with the body, and are of varying velocities depending upon how far from the surface of the body they are. The axis areas, on the other hand, rotate very slowly compared to the rotation rate of the magnetic shells. Now, this means that as the mass from the shells enters the axis area they will "back up" to some extent, forming great vortexes above and leading into (or out of in the case of the opposite axis) the pole (or axis) area. As was the case in the gravitational cycle, one polar vortex will move clockwise while the other moves counterclockwise.

Between the stresses placed on outer shells by this "twisting" at the poles, and the aforementioned slippage along the equatorial plane, great pressures are felt by these outer shells, causing them to stretch. When these shells reach the point where they can no longer keep up and can stretch no further they will shear (break). A common and oft demonstrated law of physics states that a magnetic line of force releases the energy it contains at the point of breakage. What they call the "energy" within a magnetic line is mass, and once released, this mass must go somewhere, and so will instantly join with a nearby line of force which is still intact.

Many velocities are involved with the mass released from a broken line of force, but in this paper we will consider only the two primary velocities. First, the velocity of the mass

Mass thus released from a magnetic shell leaves in its former position a "hole" which has a velocity greater than that of light. This hole may be visualized as a bubble of nothing, or an absolute vacuum which is moving too fast for any mass to catch up with and fill it. This bubble of nothing (space) is repelled by the mass which produced it and vice versa. If not restricted, this bubble will move

Gravity B offers the greatest value of repulsion at the point where the velocity of c

The primary factor determining the specific value of both the major and minor repulsive forces is the permeability of the body, and this fact was clearly demonstrated through our

After further testing and experimentation our theory began to take shape. Based on results of variations of tests 7 and 8, and through ongoing follow-up tests with permanent and electromagnets, alternating currents and direct currents, we discovered how to produce an abundant, uncontrollable flow of gravity A and B. We thereby concluded that the repulsive force is directly proportional to the permeability value of the falling body times the total mass value, so that Fr = μ m, where Fr = force repulsive, μ = permeability, and m = mass. This of course is stated in the simplest of terms, for as we take into consideration the many integral functions such as velocities, rotation rates, gravitational fields involved, and the specific magnetic fields the falling body is passing through, the mathematical functions take on levels of complexities which cannot be properly addressed in this short paper. Even so, it should now be apparent

After countless failures, our team in 1980 built and tested a gravity generator to check the validity of our application of the theory of falling bodies to solar structure and solar power generation. It worked beautifully, producing great quantities of gravity B - the repulsive force. This theory is correct, and further research has revealed methods of controlling the output and direction of gravity B.

Project Stardust is now nearly thirty years old, and though we have repeatedly been crucified by the scientific community each and every time we've made one of our periodic disclosures, reverence for the truth demands we say it again: Galileo was incorrect, Newton was incorrect, and Einstein was incorrect. Clearly, the electron theory is wrong, and nuclear theory is very, very wrong. We have

In the time of Galileo and Newton the church decided questions of nature's laws in the following manner: we believe this or that, therefore it is true. During the days of Maxwell and Faraday this mystical base had been temporarily replaced with a true scientific doctrine: it is true, therefore we believe it. One has only to examine quantum physics to understand which doctrine is currently prevailing, and if this isn't corrected, and

Send inquires to :

Lloyd B. Zirbes, Director

Zirbes Enterprises

Route 1, Box 206

Foreston, MN 56330

January 18, 1988

*Reproduction and distribution of this material is vigorously requested and encouraged.